1. RRI Digital Repository
  2. 05. Light and Matter Physics
  3. Research Papers (LAMP)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2289/7538
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSahoo, Surya Narayan-
dc.contributor.authorChakraborti, Sanchari-
dc.contributor.authorPati, Arun K-
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Urbasi-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T09:05:08Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-08T09:05:08Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Review Letters 2020, Vol.125, p123601en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031-9007-
dc.identifier.issn1079-7114(Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/7538-
dc.descriptionOpen Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractQuantum State Tomography (QST) has been the traditional method for characterization of an unknown state. Recently, many direct measurement methods have been implemented to reconstruct the state in a resource efficient way. In this letter, we present an interferometric method, in which, any qubit state, whether mixed or pure, can be inferred from the visibility, phase shift and average intensity of an interference pattern using a single shot measurement -- hence, we call it Quantum State Interferography. This provides us with a "black box" approach to quantum state estimation, wherein, between the incidence of the photon and extraction of state information, we are not changing any conditions within the set-up, thus giving us a true single shot estimation of the quantum state. In contrast, standard QST requires at least two measurements for pure state qubit and at least three measurements for mixed state qubit reconstruction. We then go on to show that QSI is more resource efficient than QST for quantification of entanglement in pure bipartite qubits. We experimentally implement our method with high fidelity using the polarisation degree of freedom of light. An extension of the scheme to pure states involving d−1 interferograms for d -dimensional systems is also presented. Thus, the scaling gain is even more dramatic in the qudit scenario for our method where in contrast, standard QST, without any assumptions, scales roughly as d2 .en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Physical Societyen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200207446N/abstracten_US
dc.relation.urihttps://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07446en_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.123601en_US
dc.rights2020 American Physical Societyen_US
dc.titleQuantum State Interferographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Papers (LAMP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020_PhysRevLett_Vol.125_Article No.123601.pdfOpen Access1.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in RRI Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.