Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2289/6674
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Naveen-
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Dipanjan-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Prateek-
dc.contributor.authorNath, Biman B.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-10T13:56:21Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-10T13:56:21Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.citationMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters , 2016, Vol. 465, p1720-1740en_US
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2966 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/6674-
dc.descriptionOpen Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractWe explore the formation of superbubbles through energy deposition by multiple supernovae (SNe) in a uniform medium. We use the total energy conserving, 3D hydrodynamic simulations to study how SNe correlated in space and time create superbubbles. While isolated SNe fizzle out completely by ∼1 Myr due to radiative losses, for a realistic cluster size it is likely that subsequent SNe go off within the hot/dilute bubble and sustain the shock till the cluster lifetime. For realistic cluster sizes, we find that the bubble remains overpressured only if, for a given ng0, NOB is sufficiently large. While most of the input energy is still lost radiatively, superbubbles can retain up to ∼5–10 per cent of the input energy in the form of kinetic+thermal energy till 10 Myr for interstellar medium density ng0 ≈ 1 cm−3. We find that the mechanical efficiency decreases for higher densities ( ηmech∝n−2/3g0 ηmech∝ng0−2/3 ng0, NOB is sufficiently large. While most of the input energy is still lost radiatively, superbubbles can retain up to ∼5–10 per cent of the input energy in the form of kinetic+thermal energy till 10 Myr for interstellar medium density ng0 ≈ 1 cm−3. We find that the mechanical efficiency decreases for higher densities ( ηmech∝n−2/3g0 ηmech∝ng0−2/3 ). We compare the radii and velocities of simulated supershells with observations and the classical adiabatic model. Our simulations show that the superbubbles retain only ≲ 10 per cent of the injected energy, thereby explaining the observed smaller size and slower expansion of supershells. We also confirm that a sufficiently large (≳ 104) number of SNe are required to go off in order to create a steady wind with a stable termination shock within the superbubble. We show that the mechanical efficiency increases with increasing resolution, and that explicit diffusion is required to obtain converged results.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press for the Royal Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.tmp.1524Yen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://arxiv.org/abs/1603.00815en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2522en_US
dc.rights2016 The authors & the Royal Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.subjecthydrodynamics, methodsen_US
dc.subjectnumerical, ISMen_US
dc.subjectbubblesen_US
dc.titleHow multiple supernovae overlap to form superbubblesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Papers (A&A)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2017_MNRAS_465_1720.pdfOpen Access5.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in RRI Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.