1. RRI Digital Repository
  2. 05. Light and Matter Physics
  3. Research Papers (LAMP)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2289/7413
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Ashutosh-
dc.contributor.authorAhamed, Ijaz-
dc.contributor.authorHome, Dipankar-
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Urbasi-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-23T09:07:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-23T09:07:28Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Optical Society of America B, 2020, Vol.37, p157en_US
dc.identifier.issn0740-3224-
dc.identifier.issn1520-8540(Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/7413-
dc.descriptionRestricted Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractGiven a non-maximally entangled state, an operationally significant question is to quantitatively assess as to what extent the state is away from the maximally entangled state, which is of importance in evaluating the efficacy of the state for its various uses as a resource. It is this question which is examined in this paper for two-qubit pure entangled states in terms of different entanglement measures like Negativity (N), Logarithmic Negativity (LN), and Entanglement of Formation (EOF). Although these entanglement measures are defined differently, to what extent they differ in quantitatively addressing the earlier mentioned question has remained uninvestigated. Theoretical estimate in this paper shows that an appropriately defined parameter characterizing the fractional deviation of any given entangled state from the maximally entangled state in terms of N is quite different from that computed in terms of EOF with their values differing up to ~ 15 % for states further away from the maximally entangled state. Similarly, the values of such fractional deviation parameters estimated using the entanglement measures LN and EOF, respectively, also strikingly differ among themselves with the maximum value of this difference being around 23 %. This analysis is complemented by illustration of these differences in terms of empirical results obtained from a suitably planned experimental study. Thus, such appreciable amount of quantitative non-equivalence between the entanglement measures in addressing the experimentally relevant question considered in the present paper highlights the requirement of an appropriate quantifier for such intent. We indicate directions of study that can be explored towards finding such a quantifier.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOptical Society of Americaen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190709268S/abstracten_US
dc.relation.urihttps://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09268en_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.37.000157en_US
dc.rights2020 Optical Society of Americaen_US
dc.titleRevisiting comparison between entanglement measures for two-qubit pure statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Papers (LAMP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020_Journal of the Optical Society of America B_Vol.37_ p157.pdf
  Restricted Access		Restricted Access2.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
Show simple item record


Items in RRI Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.