Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2289/3931
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSamuel, J.-
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Supurna-
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Abhijit-
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-22T06:41:21Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-22T06:41:21Z-
dc.date.issued2009-12-14-
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Review E, 2009, Vol.80, p063901en
dc.identifier.issn1550-2376 (Online)-
dc.identifier.issn1539-3755-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/3931-
dc.descriptionOpen Access.en
dc.description.abstractWe point out that the disagreement between the paper by Neukirch and Starostin [S. Neukirch and E. L. Starostin, Phys. Rev. E 78, 041912 (2008)] and ours [J. Samuel, S. Sinha, and A. Ghosh, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, S253 (2006)] is only apparent and stems from a difference in approach. Neukirch and Starostin are concerned with classical elasticity and individual curves while we focus on statistical averages over curves.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Physical Societyen
dc.relation.urihttp://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0250en
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.063901en
dc.relation.urihttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PhRvE..80f3901Sen
dc.rights2009 American Physical Societyen
dc.titleComment on "Writhe formulas and antipodal points in plectonemic DNA configurations"en
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Research Papers (TP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2009_PRE_v80_063901.pdfOpen Access46.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in RRI Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.