Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2289/3258
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSamuel, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-16T10:43:33Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-16T10:43:33Z-
dc.date.issued2000-10-
dc.identifier.citationClassical and Quantum Gravity, 2000, Vol.17, pL141-L148en
dc.identifier.issn0264-9381-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/3258-
dc.descriptionRestricted Access.en
dc.description.abstractThis letter is a critique of Barbero's constrained Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity, on which current work in loop quantum gravity is based. While we do not dispute the correctness of Barbero's formulation of general relativity, we offer some criticisms of an aesthetic nature. We point out that unlike Ashtekar's complex SU(2) connection, Barbero's real SO(3) connection does not admit an interpretation as a space-time gauge field. We show that if one tries to interpret Barbero's real SO(3) connection as a space-time gauge field, the theory is not diffeomorphism invariant. We conclude that Barbero's formulation is not a gauge theory of gravity in the sense that Ashtekar's Hamiltonian formulation is. The advantages of Barbero's real connection formulation have been bought at the price of giving up the description of gravity as a gauge field. PACS numbers: 0330, 0365, 0420en
dc.format.extent80119 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltd.en
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/101en
dc.rights2000 IOP Publishing Ltd.en
dc.titleIs Barbero's Hamiltonian formulation a gauge theory of Lorentzian gravity?en
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Research Papers (TP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2000 C&QG.17.PL141.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access78.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in RRI Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.