Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2289/3254
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarbero, G.-
dc.contributor.authorVaradarajan, Madhavan-
dc.contributor.authorFernando, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-16T08:58:28Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-16T08:58:28Z-
dc.date.issued1999-11-
dc.identifier.citationClassical Quantum Gravjity, 1999, Vol.16, p3765-3768en
dc.identifier.issn0264-9381-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/3254-
dc.descriptionRestricted Access.en
dc.description.abstractWe show that the recent claim that the (2 + 1)-dimensional Ashtekar formulation for general relativity has a finite number of physical degrees of freedom is incorrect.en
dc.format.extent68037 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltd.en
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/16/11/401en
dc.rights1999 IOP Publishing Ltd.en
dc.titleA comment on the degrees of freedom in the Ashtekar formulation for 2 + 1 gravityen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Research Papers (TP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1999.CQG.16.P3765.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access66.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in RRI Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.