Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2289/3242
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBondi, Hermann-
dc.contributor.authorSamuel, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-10T07:41:59Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-10T07:41:59Z-
dc.date.issued1997-04-
dc.identifier.citationPhysics Letters A, 1997, Vol.228, p121-126en
dc.identifier.issn0375-9601-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/3242-
dc.descriptionRestricted Access.en
dc.description.abstractWe respond to a recent paper by Rindler [Phys. Lett. A 187 (1994) 235] on the “anti-Machian” nature of the Lense-Thirring effect. We remark that his conclusion depends crucially on the particular formulation of Mach's principle used and that a different formulation can lead to the opposite conclusion.en
dc.format.extent603211 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(97)00117-5en
dc.rights1997 Elsevier B.V.en
dc.titleThe Lense-Thirring effect and Mach's principleen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Research Papers (TP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1997 PLA V228 p121.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access589.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in RRI Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.