RRI Banner

Evaluating the effectiveness of radio frequency interference removal algorithms for single pulse searches

dc.additionalCollection: RAS Journalsen_US
dc.contributor.authorHombal, R S
dc.contributor.authorLevin, L
dc.contributor.authorStappers, B W
dc.contributor.authorDroog, M
dc.contributor.authorKarastergiou, A
dc.contributor.authorLumbaa, D
dc.contributor.authorMickaliger, M B
dc.contributor.authorNaidu, A
dc.contributor.authorRajwade, K M
dc.contributor.authorSepulveda, J
dc.contributor.authorShaw, B
dc.contributor.authorSingh, S
dc.contributor.authorPrabu, T
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-25T08:44:31Z
dc.date.available2026-06-25T08:44:31Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-14
dc.descriptionOpen Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractRadio frequency interference (RFI), the presence of artificial and/or terrestrial signals in astronomical data, poses a great challenge to the search for pulsars and radio transients, such as rotating radio transients (RRATs) and fast radio bursts (FRBs), by obscuring or distorting the signal of interest and resulting in large numbers of erroneous detections. RFI mitigation algorithms aim to remove this interference and improve the chance of detection of transients, but with the growing number of techniques, selecting the most appropriate method for a given survey can be problematic. The choice of method is particularly important in real-time searches planned for next-generation telescopes such as those of the SKAO, where there is no possibility to reprocess the data. In this paper, we explore the algorithm selection problem by injecting pulses into data which simulates several RFI environments. A set of these files is then cleaned using RFI mitigation algorithms and run through a single pulse search pipeline to analyse the recovery of the injected pulses. We examine the recovery of the injected single pulses with an emphasis on a number of cases spanning a range of pulse brightness, width, and dispersion measure. The efficacy and side effects of a few popular RFI excision methods, namely IQRM, SKF, and ZDMF are evaluated.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRAS Techniques and Instruments, 2026, Vol. 5, AR No. rzag004en_US
dc.identifier.issn2752-8200
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/8767
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.08351en_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2026en_US
dc.subjectAlgorithmsen_US
dc.subjectRadio Frequency Interferenceen_US
dc.subjectFast Radio Burstsen_US
dc.subjectPulsarsen_US
dc.subjectRRATsen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Data and Processesen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the effectiveness of radio frequency interference removal algorithms for single pulse searchesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files