RRI Banner

Comparative behavior of aromatic disulfide and diselenide monolayers on polycrystalline gold films using cyclic voltammetry, STM, and quartz crystal microbalance

dc.contributor.authorAslam, M
dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, K
dc.contributor.authorVijayamohanan, K
dc.contributor.authorLakshminarayanan, V
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-28T07:18:04Z
dc.date.available2007-06-28T07:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2001-02-15
dc.descriptionRestricted Access.en
dc.description.abstractA comparative investigation of the self-assembled monolayers of diphenyl disulfide (DDS), diphenyl diselenide (DDSe), and naphthalene disulfide (NDS) on polycrystalline gold films using STM, QCM, and electrochemical techniques is presented. The geometric constraint imposed by the rigid naphthalene ring for NDS inhibits the cleavage of the S–S bond, thus adversely affecting the monolayer organization and stability relative to the monolayers formed with DDS and DDSe. A comparative analysis using techniques like cyclic voltammetry and quartz-crystal microbalance indicates that, for DDS, the facile cleavage of the S–S bond leads to strong binding of the adsorbate molecules at the preferred surface sites, resulting in a rather well-organized self-assembled structure. The STM pattern of NDS reveals a periodic domain (i.e., less than 10 nm in size) while no such small domains are seen in the case of DDS and DDSe due to the orientational flexibility of the rings.en
dc.format.extent231780 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2001, Vol.234, p410-417en
dc.identifier.issn0021-9797
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/3160
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevier B.Ven
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1006/jcis.2000.7328en
dc.rights2001 Elsevier B.V.en
dc.titleComparative behavior of aromatic disulfide and diselenide monolayers on polycrystalline gold films using cyclic voltammetry, STM, and quartz crystal microbalanceen
dc.typeArticleen

Files