RRI Banner

Comment on "Writhe formulas and antipodal points in plectonemic DNA configurations"

dc.contributor.authorSamuel, J.
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Supurna
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Abhijit
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-22T06:41:21Z
dc.date.available2010-07-22T06:41:21Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-14
dc.descriptionOpen Access.en
dc.description.abstractWe point out that the disagreement between the paper by Neukirch and Starostin [S. Neukirch and E. L. Starostin, Phys. Rev. E 78, 041912 (2008)] and ours [J. Samuel, S. Sinha, and A. Ghosh, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, S253 (2006)] is only apparent and stems from a difference in approach. Neukirch and Starostin are concerned with classical elasticity and individual curves while we focus on statistical averages over curves.en
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Review E, 2009, Vol.80, p063901en
dc.identifier.issn1550-2376 (Online)
dc.identifier.issn1539-3755
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2289/3931
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Physical Societyen
dc.relation.urihttp://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0250en
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.063901en
dc.relation.urihttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PhRvE..80f3901Sen
dc.rights2009 American Physical Societyen
dc.titleComment on "Writhe formulas and antipodal points in plectonemic DNA configurations"en
dc.typeArticleen

Files