Atom interferometry and the gravitational redshift
| dc.contributor.author | Sinha, Supurna | |
| dc.contributor.author | Samuel, J. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-08-05T10:21:27Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-08-05T10:21:27Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-07-21 | |
| dc.description | Restricted Access. An open-access version is available at arXiv.org (one of the alternative locations) | en |
| dc.description.abstract | From the principle of equivalence, Einstein predicted that clocks slow down in a gravitational field. Since the general theory of relativity is based on the principle of equivalence, it is essential to test this prediction accurately. M¨uller, Peters and Chu claim that a reinterpretation of decade old experiments with atom interferometers leads to a sensitive test of this gravitational redshift effect at the Compton frequency. Wolf et al dispute this claim and adduce arguments against it. In this paper, we distill these arguments to a single fundamental objection: an atom is not a clock ticking at the Compton frequency. We conclude that atom interferometry experiments conducted to date do not yield such sensitive tests of the gravitational redshift. Finally, we suggest a new interferometric experiment to measure the gravitational redshift, which realizes a quantum version of the classical clock ‘paradox’. PACS numbers: 04.80.−y, 03.75.Dg | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2011, Vol.28, p145018 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0264-9381 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1361-6382 (Online) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2289/4061 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | IOP Publishing Ltd | en |
| dc.relation.uri | http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2587 | en |
| dc.relation.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/14/145018 | en |
| dc.relation.uri | http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011CQGra..28n5018S | en |
| dc.rights | 2011 IOP Publishing Ltd | en |
| dc.title | Atom interferometry and the gravitational redshift | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |

